In today’s global landscape, the interaction between politics and technology is intensifying, with technology playing an increasingly pivotal role in international power struggles. From peace talks in the Russia-Ukraine conflict to China’s AI companies facing regulatory battles in Europe, these events are not only shaping the global economy but also significantly altering the trajectory of technological industries. This article delves into the underlying motivations and trends behind these events.

⚖️ Russia-Ukraine Third Round of Negotiations Progress
Negotiation Timeline and Focus
The third round of negotiations is scheduled to start after June 22, with the specific date still pending. The core issues include “Ukraine’s demilitarization” and the destruction of Western weapons. Russia demands that Ukraine destroy the Western-supplied weapons, emphasizing that this is a prerequisite for a ceasefire. On June 27, Putin stated that Russia was ready for negotiations, and the two sides would discuss a conflict resolution memorandum after completing the exchange of prisoners of war.
Battlefield Dynamics
On June 27, Ukraine launched an attack on Russia’s Volgograd airbase, claiming to have hit four aircraft, including Su-34 fighter jets, and maintenance facilities. Russia has yet to respond. At the same time, Russia continued to target Ukrainian military facilities, launching six high-precision cluster attacks within a week.
💼 Latest Progress in Sino-U.S. Trade Talks
Tariff Framework Finalized
On June 26, China and the U.S. confirmed the details of their trade framework. China agreed to approve export applications for controlled items like rare earths (which had previously been restricted), while the U.S. lifted restrictions on sectors like chips and ethane. The U.S. weighted average tariff on Chinese goods was reduced from 14.5% to 3.0%, and China’s tariff on U.S. goods dropped to 10%. However, the 24% suspension tariff may be reinstated after 90 days, and the focus of the negotiations remains unresolved.
Key Points of Contention
China retains the “export control rights” over rare earths (accounting for 85% of global separation capacity) and has flexibility in agricultural product purchases. Meanwhile, U.S. soybean exports to China saw a sharp 40% decrease in April, illustrating the ongoing tensions in trade. Trump’s policy reversals could still pose risks, with “fentanyl tariffs” not included in the agreement, leaving some Chinese goods with an effective tax rate of 20-30%.
☢️ Escalating U.S. Threats to Iran
Consequences of Airstrikes and Fragility of Ceasefire
On June 22, the U.S. and Israel jointly conducted airstrikes on Iran’s Fordow and Natanz nuclear facilities, deploying GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs. Initially, Iran claimed the damage was minimal, but on June 25, it admitted to significant damage. On June 23, Trump announced a “progressive ceasefire” with Iran, but by June 24, Israeli forces continued airstrikes on Tehran’s radar stations, further escalating tensions.
Potential Conflict Risks
Trump threatened to “bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities again,” and Iran’s foreign minister responded strongly: “Blood will flow, but we will not give up an inch of land.” Iran has turned to China and Russia for assistance, with the Iranian Defense Minister visiting China and seeking military support.
🤖 AI and Geopolitical Conflict: The DeepSeek Shutdown and the Tech Cold War
Core Issue: Germany’s “Compliance Strangulation” of DeepSeek
German Data Protection Commissioner Meike Kamp invoked the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), accusing DeepSeek of “illegally transferring user data to China.” She demanded that Apple and Google remove the app from their German app stores. If the platforms fail to comply, they could face hefty fines amounting to 4% of their global annual revenue. This issue is not only about data security but also about the competition for technological sovereignty. DeepSeek, with over 130 million downloads and performance that rivals GPT-4, directly challenges Western AI dominance.
Global Blockade Pattern Emerges
The EU is responding swiftly, with Italy banning DeepSeek, the Netherlands prohibiting its use on government devices, and Spain and Belgium launching investigations. The European Union could collectively ban the app if Germany activates the Digital Services Act (DSA). Simultaneously, the U.S. is pushing forward with the “Hostile AI Ban Act,” which seeks to ban federal agencies from using Chinese AI models. NASA and the state of Texas have already banned DeepSeek, accusing it of supporting China’s military and intelligence activities.
The Life-or-Death Struggle in Technological Warfare
DeepSeek is caught in a dilemma: complying with GDPR would require localizing data in the EU, costing tens of millions of euros, and would involve opening up the algorithm’s source code to regulators. In response, DeepSeek is pushing an “open source + local deployment” strategy, providing its 67-billion-parameter model weights for businesses to run on local servers, thereby cutting off the “data transmission” accusation. China is trying to emulate TikTok’s path by setting up compliance teams and negotiating with German cloud service providers for data hosting, though geopolitical trust remains a major obstacle.
🔋 Electric Vehicles and Supply Chain: Xiaomi YU7’s Production Hell
Order Frenzy and Delivery Crisis
Xiaomi’s YU7 electric vehicle broke records, with 200,000 orders within 2 minutes, 240,000 within 18 hours, and over 300,000 within 24 hours. However, production is unable to keep pace, with delivery times extending to 53-56 weeks.
Three Major Supply Chain Challenges
YU7 faces significant challenges: a chip shortage (due to production delays with NVIDIA’s Thor chip), a grey market for overpriced orders, and internal resource conflicts. With over 400,000 delayed SU7 orders, allocating production capacity to the YU7 risks massive customer cancellations.
Strategic Missteps and Transition Pains
Xiaomi YU7 was positioned as a luxury SUV with an expected price above 300,000 RMB, which clashes with the brand’s traditional image of “cost-effectiveness.” Moreover, user acceptance of the high price is low, and the recent fatal accident involving SU7 has further tarnished the brand’s trust.
🤖 Tesla Milestone: Full Autonomous Driving Delivery Redefines Industry Rules
Technological Breakthrough: 30-Minute Autonomous Cross-City Drive
Tesla’s Model Y made history with the first 30-minute autonomous drive, crossing both urban roads and highways at speeds up to 116 km/h, without human intervention or remote control. The vehicle is equipped with the HW5.0 platform, which includes four 4D millimeter-wave radars, twelve cameras, and the Dojo supercomputer (1.1 EFLOPS of computing power, five times greater than previous versions).
Disruption in Both Commercial and Industry Norms
Tesla’s innovative delivery model eliminates traditional logistics and dealership steps, cutting costs by over 30%. The company is also introducing a Robotaxi ecosystem, offering a pay-per-mile subscription ($0.5 per kilometer) for the first 1,000 Model Ys equipped with autonomous driving.
Controversies and Challenges
Despite these breakthroughs, Tesla faces safety concerns, with the NHTSA investigating the Full Self-Driving system’s ability to recognize construction zones. Additionally, various states have imposed multiple licensing requirements for autonomous vehicles, and Tesla’s aggressive rollout strategy may trigger regulatory backlash.
Conclusion
The current global landscape is a tangled web of geopolitical tensions, technological battles, and industrial transformations. Breakthroughs in AI, autonomous driving, and electric vehicles are not only reshaping industries but also playing a crucial role in international power struggles. From DeepSeek’s regulatory challenges to Tesla’s autonomous driving revolution, technology is both the battlefield and the weapon in the ongoing global competition. As this high-stakes game unfolds, the way we navigate these challenges and opportunities will define the future global order.