âThis isnât a threat to the dollar, but a weapon to reinforce its dominanceâ â These words from U.S. Treasury Secretary Behsent reveal the strategic ambitions behind the GENIUS Act. In May 2025, the U.S. Senate passed this landmark legislation, bringing stablecoins under the federal regulatory framework and igniting a campaign to redefine the global financial order with the âonâchain dollar.â
âĄď¸ The GENIUS Act: A LongâPlanned Financial Revolution
The core rules of the GENIUS Act are simple but potent:
- Mandatory Reserve Pegging: Stablecoins must be backed 1:1 by U.S. cash or shortâterm Treasury bills maturing within 93 days.
- Expanded Issuer Pool: Enables banks, fintech firms, and even retailers like Walmart to issue stablecoins.
- Transparent Oversight: Requires monthly reserve audits and rigorous antiâmoneyâlaundering compliance, ending the era of âWild Westâ stablecoins.
This legislation has lit a match under the market. The total market cap of stablecoins surged from $20 billion in 2020 to $249.7 billion in 2025 â an elevenâfold rise in five years. Dominating this space, the âtwin giantsâ of USDT and USDC now hold an 85% combined market share. Meanwhile, Standard Chartered predicts that by 2028 the stablecoin market will exceed $2 trillion, swallowing traditional finance like a âblack hole.â
đ° The âLifelineâ for U.S. Debt: ShortâTerm Relief, LongâTerm Risk
For the U.S. Treasury, stablecoins are a âspecial antidoteâ for the growing national debt:
- A New Pool of Investors: Tether and Circle now hold $116 billion in U.S. Treasuries, making them one of the top 20 holders globally â surpassing Germany and Mexico.
- A TrillionâDollar Demand Engine: At a $2 trillion market cap, stablecoins could create $1 trillion in new shortâterm Treasury demand, easing the U.S. governmentâs financing pressure.
But this âdebt transfusionâ has critical limitations:
- ShortâTerm Focus: The GENIUS Act only allows stablecoins to hold shortâterm Treasury bills (maturing in â¤93 days), making them irrelevant for longâterm debt (over 95% of the $36 trillion total).
- Banking System Impact: According to Bank of America, stablecoins could siphon $6.6 trillion in bank deposits â $5.7 trillion of which are demand deposits. This would cripple smaller banks, which fund roughly 60% of U.S. small business loans and 80% of agricultural lending.
- Deposit Flight Risk: At a $2 trillion market cap, stablecoins could cause an 8â15% deposit erosion across the banking sector.
đ Dollar Hegemony 2.0: Digital Colonization and New World Order
As Behsent asserted, âWhen a Nigerian uses a dollar stablecoin, he no longer needs to hold actual dollars â yet he is still captured within the dollarâs global orbit.â This statement captures Americaâs core strategy:
- OnâChain Dominance: Today, 99% of stablecoins are dollarâpegged, with annual settlements exceeding $28 trillion â more than Visa and Mastercard combined.
- Displacing Local Currencies: In Turkey, Argentina, and other highâinflation nations, 69% of stablecoin transactions now replace local currency payments, eroding monetary sovereignty.
- Geopolitical Leverage: New legislation forces emerging economies to choose between accepting âdollar stablecoin penetrationâ or isolating themselves from global digital commerce.
đ¨ The Ticking Time Bomb: Systemic Risk Beneath the Boom
- Banking Crisis:
Small and mediumâsized banks risk a double squeeze â deposit outflows and reduced lending capacity. These institutions are the backbone for 60% of small business loans and 80% of agricultural loans in the U.S. - âShadow Bankingâ on the Rise:
Stablecoin issuers assume traditional bank roles (deposits, lending) but operate without deposit insurance or capital adequacy constraints. An âoutâofâtheâblueâ shock â like the USDC deâpeg during the 2023 Silicon Valley Bank crisis â could spiral into a fullâblown onâchain financial crisis. - Global Pushback:
- The EU has introduced the MiCA framework.
- China is expanding its digital yuan across borders (e.g., the mBridge project).
- Nigeria, India, and other nations have tightened stablecoin restrictions.
đ The Incurable Flaws: Why Stablecoins Arenât a CureâAll
Although Washington promotes stablecoins as an economic remedy, these digital instruments fail to fix Americaâs deeper structural issues:
- Industrial Hollowing: The U.S. trade deficit topped $1 trillion in 2024, and stablecoins canât reverse its manufacturing decline.
- National Debt Crisis: Annual net issuance of U.S. debt reached $26.7 trillion, making the $100 billion in new stablecoinâdriven demand a drop in the ocean.
- Decline of the Dollar: The dollarâs global reserve share has fallen from 72% in 2000 to 58% today, while BRICS nations intensify efforts to deâdollarize.
đŽ The Road Ahead: Three Disruption Scenarios
Scenario | Trigger | Chain Reaction |
---|---|---|
Optimistic Hegemony | Mass stablecoin adoption across emerging markets | U.S. bond yields drop 0.5%; dollar becomes global settlement standard |
Pessimistic Collapse | Major deâpeg + fragmented regulation | Bank runs, bond sellâoff, and global liquidity crisis |
Alternatives Rise | Multiple CBDCs unite as global trade platforms | Stablecoins pushed to the sidelines, dollar hegemony weakened |
đ Conclusion: A Painkiller, Not a Cure
At its core, the stablecoin is a digital extension of dollar dominance â a temporary painkiller for Americaâs fiscal crisis:
â
Shortâterm value: New buyers for U.S. debt, slowing the crisis.
â
Strategic significance: Exporting the dollar onto the blockchain, countering deâdollarization.
â Longâterm limitations: Fails to revive the industrial base or solve the growing debt crisis, and introduces fresh systemic risk.
History offers a warning. In the 1970s, dollar hegemony was cemented by âpetrodollarsâ; today, America aims to build its reign on âonâchain dollars.â Yet without a strong real economy, this digital façade may one day collapse.
Behsentâs statement rings true: âStablecoins are a tool for defending dollar dominanceâ â but for nations worldwide, the pressing question is how to avoid becoming digital colonies of the American dollar.